Abstract
The widespread application of artificial intelligence is reshaping the discipline of geography, yet the deeper
challenge lies in how the computational thinking embodied in AI can be deeply integrated with geospatial thinking. Drawing
on the outcomes of the“spatial computational thinking”model and the“Encoding Geography”initiative, this paper
constructs a theoretical framework of“dual-thinking integration”of computational thinking and geospatial thinking for
geography education in universities. The framework reveals the diff erences and complementarities between the two types
of thinking across four dimensions: epistemology, methodology, capability, and innovation. Furthermore, it proposes a
three-stage teaching pathway—“geographic problem formulation, computational method implementation, and geospatial
meaning reconstruction”—aimed at guiding students towards the synergistic operation of the two kinds of thinking through
iterative dialogue between output results and spatial interpretation. A case study based on an economic geography module
titled “Industrial Spatial Agglomeration”illustrates that this pathway helps students move from merely“operating tools”
to“thinking geographically with tools,”thereby offering a feasible approach to addressing the challenges of cultivating
geography talents in the context of rapid technological iteration.
Key words
computational thinking /
geospatial thinking /
dual-thinking integration /
talent cultivation model /
university
geography education
Cite this article
Download Citations
Tang Jie.
The Dual-Thinking Integration of Computational Thinking and Geospatial Thinking:
A Theoretical Framework and Teaching Pathway for Cultivating Geography Talents in Higher
Education[J]. Geography Teaching. 2026, 0(11): 42-47
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}